Bottom Bracket and Crank Standards

Browsing around the Cozy Behive, I found and article on the evolution of bottom brackets and interfaces in road and MTN bikes. Unfortunately, no mention of BMX bottom brackets. Here is the BMX-U page on BB's.

BMX has gone through the same evolution (loose ball, cartridge, press fit); the only difference being that BMX adopted the cupped, press fit US bottom bracket. Since then, we have moved independent, albeit parallel to the development of road/mtn bottom brackets. We have arrived at something very similar to the BB30 standard:

BB30: 42mm ID 68mm width

MID: 41.275mm (1 5/8") ID, 68mm width

Advantages of BB30

BB30 uses a standard metric ID, which makes off-the shelf bearings available for up to a 30mm spindle. Though it should be noted that to fit a fair sized bearing to take the extra side loads our bikes encounter, it may be best to limit spindle size to 25 mm. Even so, 25mm is larger than our existing 22, and 19mm spindles. With this increase comes the prospect of high strength 7068 or 7075 Aluminum.

Using an existing standard accepted by the rest of the cycling industry opens up the BMX market to larger manufacturers, higher technologies, and respectively, BMX companies' customer base. Hopefully, expanding their market will help smaller operations survive. Profile has a similar situation with their 48 spline cranks and dirt jumpers.

Sprocket/Crank Interface

In recent years we have seen a shift in sprocket/crank interface paradigm... Ok, that may be a bit exaggerated... At least there has been a change in design.

Traditional, Perpendicular Bolt

My first introduction to crank torque transfer was with the integrated stud on one piece cranks. Although effective, tolorances were often poor, and low-end sprockets were usually thin steel, further compounding any issues.

As BMX progressed, we moved to a bolt to secure the sprocket to the crankset (usually 3/8" or 10mm). Today, virtually all cranks use the bolt-on design. This helped solve some of the tolerance issues and has served as the standard for bmx. From a structural perspective, this design requires either a larger spindle boss or a separate hole cut in the crank arm for a sprocket boss.

A slight hybrid of one and three piece mounting systems, that has resurfaced recently is the use of a headless bolt. Mechanik makes a bolt called the Pin Head. The purpose of this design is not to hold the sprocket to the crank, but only to transfer torque. Using this design allows small spacers to be inserted between the arm and the sprocket to dial in the chainline.

Nano-drive

As Sprockets reduced in size (with flatland at the forefront), a need for less offset in the mounting position. Enter the nano-drive. Most nano-drive bosses use smaller bolts than the standard bosses.

Spline Drive

When faced with the challenge of small sprockets, Tree Bicycle Co. decided to redesign the mounting design. What they came up with was transfering torque through the spindle, rather than the crank arm. With most cranks now using 19mm, 48 spline, Tree's spline drive has a large potential market. Recently Profile decided to release their own version of spline drive (releasing a spline drive sprocket was logical for Profile as they are known for their 48 spline cranks). Unfortunately, Profile decided it was best to use 8 large splines on the adapter, rather than the 9 available on the Tree. I don't know why this happened, but it may be just to avoid any patent issues.

There is one big problem with spline drive: it is limited to 19mm, 48 spline cranks.

Socket Drive/ Nonogram

Flatware's (Odyssey) response to shrinking sprockets was to standardize. Well, sort of. They are the only company making a crank that works with the 9-sided mating surface, but do provide the specs and drawings(PDF) on their site. If this design is adopted, adapters can be made to adapt socket drive to a 48-spline crank, in effect making it another spline drive. The big advantage to this over standard spline drive is it does not limit the spindle design.

BMX-U Sprocket Page

KHE Clone Hubs: Calculating Slack

I recently posted this on BMX-U

Ok, this should apply to all KHE Clone coasters, as well as Odyssey and other "butterfly spring" coasters (though they may have different room in the hubshell. However, if you have an externally adjustable hub, you will just have to measure by backpedalling 1 revolution to 0* (or 90, whatever works for you), then pedaling forward and guestimating. Note: You cannot get 90* slack on these hubs, even with a relatively low 2.5 gearing and min spacers!

Driver/clutch thread pitch: 15mm per rotation (23mm/1.53 total)

KHE Spacer thickness: 1mm

Tophat Spacer: 5/7.5mm depending on orientation.

X= Total spacer stack (i.e. tophat set regular 7.5mm + 1mm spacer = 8.5)

G= Gear Ratio or Chainwheel (sprocket) size / Driver size (i.e. 25/9= 2.78)

( 12.7 - X ) / 15 * 360 / G = Degrees slack at pedals*

*assuming good chain tension, etc.

BMX Wiki!

It's been a while since I posted, I have been working on getting a bmx wiki up. Thanks to a few cats over at http://www.bikeguide.org/forums it is getting filled up. Take a look, and please contribute what you can. Even the smallest stuff helps. http://www.bmx-u.com